Send & Receive

Establish the right context: receiving address

When using Send & Receive, first identify whether the current object is an account, asset, network, transaction or permission. Then relate receiving address to target network instead of reading either label alone.

For Send & Receive, a repeatable verification habit is more durable than memorizing where a button appears. Check receiving address, then target network, and finally amount. Interfaces can change and network conditions can move, while the reasoning behind those checks remains useful.

If a result differs from expectations, record receiving address, target network, and other non-secret evidence, then reconstruct the sequence of actions. Never send recovery secrets to someone offering to “restore” or “verify” an account, and avoid untrusted remote-control software.

Understand how it works in practice: target network

How target network, amount, and gas relate in practice

When a request involves target network, slow the decision down enough to identify what it changes, which network it relies on, and whether amount can be independently verified.

A useful review order is source, object, request, and result. The source establishes where the action came from, target network identifies the object, and amount clarifies the scope. After submission, keep a transaction hash or other public record so that changing status can be checked again without relying on one interface message.

Verification continues after submission. Keep public evidence related to target network and use amount to review status when necessary. On-chain transactions generally cannot be reversed by a wallet provider alone, and third-party DApps or contracts can carry their own risks, so blind resubmission is a poor troubleshooting method.

• Confirm the real object behind target network
• Check the network or permission scope for amount
• Use gas or another public record to verify the result
• Never share a seed phrase, private key or verification code

Review the action step by step: amount

A practical way to approach amount is to place it inside a real task and start with gas.

Do not treat “already connected,” “used before,” or “looks familiar” as sufficient evidence. Review amount for the actual object, gas for the transaction or permission boundary, and transaction hash for the resulting state. If one step remains unclear, declining is a valid outcome.

The purpose of learning Send & Receive is to understand the action rather than mechanically complete it. Whenever amount, gas, or the expected result cannot be explained, preserve the option to decline, exit, or verify again later.

Recognize common mistakes and risks: gas

How gas, transaction hash, and receiving address relate in practice

gas is easy to misunderstand when context is missing. The account, transaction hash, and the intended action should agree before a familiar interface is treated as meaningful evidence.

The same term can behave differently across networks or DApps, so gas should always be interpreted in context. transaction hash provides a second verification angle, while receiving address helps confirm what actually happened afterward. Network-specific rules should be checked against trustworthy information for that network.

Over time, revisit gas and transaction hash, remove connections or permissions that are no longer needed, and keep the device and browser environment trustworthy. Security is not an absolute promise; it is a process of reducing secret exposure, mistaken approvals, and avoidable uncertainty.

• Confirm the real object behind gas
• Check the network or permission scope for transaction hash
• Use receiving address or another public record to verify the result
• Never share a seed phrase, private key or verification code

Build a repeatable verification habit: transaction hash

Within Send & Receive, transaction hash is not an isolated term; it affects receiving address and the on-chain result a user eventually sees.

If an interface mixes several layers of information, check transaction hash, receiving address, and target network separately. Names, icons, and familiar layouts are presentation details, not substitutes for the actual network, address, contract, or on-chain state. When the evidence conflicts, fewer new actions usually make troubleshooting easier.

Keep the security boundary explicit: the user controls the seed phrase and private keys, and imtoken will never ask for them. If a third party links transaction hash to a request for recovery secrets or verification codes, stop. When receiving address is involved, also verify the address, network, amount or permission scope.